ABSTRACT
During the pandemic, to prevent the spread of the virus, countries all adopted various safety measures, including masking, social distancing, and vaccination. However, there is a lack of methods that can quantitively evaluate the effectiveness of these countermeasures. This research first develops a model to quantitively evaluate the infection risk of riding public transit. By utilizing the developed model, the effectiveness of different countermeasures could be evaluated and compared. For demonstration purposes, the developed model is applied to a particular bus route in the City of Houston, Texas. The modeling results show that masking, social distancing, and vaccination can all reduce the infection risk for passengers. And among all these countermeasures, face masking is the most effective one. In addition, model results approve that the COVID-19 infection risk is highly related to the exposure time and the risk can be controlled by reducing the exposure time. Thus, a new strategy named the "split route strategy” is proposed and compared with the "capacity reduction strategy” using the model developed. In addition, a cost-benefit analysis is performed to assess the feasibility of the proposed "split route strategy”. Furthermore, two interviews were conducted with practitioners at Houston Metro. Both interviewees believe that face masking could significantly prevent the spread of the virus, which validated the model results. © 2022